Valgrind "client requests" to show the leak summary programmatically

It is useful to show Valgrind leak summary programmatically.

Just add some macros in your code.

#include <valgrind/memcheck.h>

int func()
{
    // ...
    VALGRIND_DO_CHANGED_LEAK_CHECK
    // ...
}

REF: http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html#mc-manual.clientreqs

Change system partition size of Android emulator

emulator -avd MyAndroid -partition-size 128 -no-snapshot-load

How to Push an Exist git Repo to a Bare Remote git Repo

add a remote repo
# git remote add --track master origin [Repository URL]

push local master branch to remote origin branch
# git push origin master

If I use "git push", I get an error "git push ‘No refs in common and none specified’".

Performance of Unaligned Memory Access in Raspberry Pi

SoC of Raspberry pi is a Broadcom BCM2835. This contains an ARM1176JZFS, ARMv6 architecture.

ARMv6 adds unaligned word(4 bytes) and halfword load and store data access support.
For detail, please check.

• ARM1176JZF-S Technical Reference Manual: 4.2. Unaligned access support
• ARM unaligned data access and floating point in Linux 

I would like to test performance when a user space process invokes a unaligned memory access (only load).
Here is my test environment and cases.

[Environment]

---

Kernel: Linux xbian 3.6.1 #4 PREEMPT Thu Nov 8 18:54:20 CET 2012 armv6l GNU/Linux
GCC: gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-12+rpi1)

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor       : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7
                  (v6l)
BogoMIPS        : 697.95
Features        : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp
                  java tls
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant     : 0x0
CPU part        : 0xb76
CPU revision    : 7

Hardware        : BCM2708
Revision        : 0002
Serial          : 0000000009b752ff

[Program]

---

unaligned.c

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>

#ifdef USE_GCC_FIXUP
struct __una_u32 {
    uint32_t x;  
} __attribute__((packed));

static inline uint32_t get_unaligned_32(const void *p)
{
    const struct __una_u32 *ptr = 
        (const struct __una_u32 *)p;
    return ptr->x;
}
#endif

int main()
{
    uint8_t buf[16];
    uint32_t i, j;

    for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
        buf[i] = i;

    for (j = 0; j < 100000000; j++) {
        /* unaligned access */
#ifndef USE_GCC_FIXUP
        i = *(unsigned int*)(&buf[1]);
#else
        i = get_unaligned_32(&buf[1]);
#endif
    }

    printf("0x%X\n", i);

    return 0;
}

[Case]

---

1. unaligned word access
   
   • fix up by hardware
     # gcc -c unaligned.c
     # time ./unaligned
     0x4030201
     
     real    0m2.053s
     user    0m2.040s
     sys     0m0.010s
   
   
   • fix up by software (gcc)
     # gcc -DUSE_GCC_FIXUP -o unaligned_gcc unaligned.c
     # time ./unaligned_gcc
     0x4030201
     
     real    0m6.384s
     user    0m6.370s
     sys     0m0.010s
   
   The result is very clear.
   
   Here I add a case is aligned access.
   Only modify:
   

   #ifndef USE_GCC_FIXUP
           i = *(unsigned int*)(&buf[0]);
   #else
   

   # time ./aligned
   0x3020100
   
   real    0m1.934s
   user    0m1.920s
   sys     0m0.000s


2. unaligned double words access
   Modify unaligned.c to support double words access
   • fix up by kernel
     # time ./unaligned64
     0x807060504030201
     
     real    1m8.754s
     user    0m7.800s
     sys     1m0.830s
     
     
   • fix up by software (gcc)
     # time ./unaligned64_gcc
     0x807060504030201
     
     real    0m9.753s
     user    0m9.700s
     sys     0m0.030s
   
   Also add a case for aligned access.
   # time ./aligned64
   0x706050403020100
   
   real    0m2.413s
   user    0m2.400s
   sys     0m0.000s

So, to avoid unaligned memory access if possible!

Note about Linux Kernel char Device Driver

There are two ways to create a struct cdev:

1. static way
• declare
• embedded in your device structure statically
  struct dummy_device {
      struct cdev cdev;
  };
• initialize
•  use cdev_init() function to initialize the cdev structure
  struct dummy_device dev;
  ...
  cdev_init(&dev.cdev, &dummy_fops);
• remove
• call cdev_del()
2. dynamic way
• declare
• memory of cdev structure is allocated dynamically
  struct dummy_device {
      struct cdev *cdev;
  };
  ...
  struct dymmy_device dev;
  dev->cdev = cdev_alloc();
• initialize
• dev->cdev.fops = &dummy_fops;
• remove
• call cdev_del()
• You don't need to call kfree() to free memory. Kernel releases the memory automatically. (talk this later)  

There is one thing you need to know about the dynamic way. 
If you use dynamic way to create a cdev structure, you should better not use cdev_init() to initialize the structure.

Let's check source code.

void cdev_init(struct cdev *cdev, 
               const struct file_operations *fops)
{
    memset(cdev, 0, sizeof *cdev);
    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cdev->list);
    kobject_init(&cdev->kobj, &ktype_cdev_default);
    cdev->ops = fops;
}

struct cdev *cdev_alloc(void)
{
    /* cdev is allocated here! */
    struct cdev *p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cdev),
                     GFP_KERNEL);
    if (p) {
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->list);
        kobject_init(&p->kobj, &ktype_cdev_dynamic);
    }
    return p;
}

If you use dynamic way to create the cdev structure, ktype_cdev_dynamic() is used to release cdev kobject.
If you use cdev_init() to initialize cdev structure that is created in dynamic way, release function of kobject is replaced with ktype_cdev_default().
In this case, after you invoke cdev_del() to remove a cdev device from kernel, this causes a memory leak.
You need to free memory manually and it is not recommended.

static void cdev_default_release(struct kobject *kobj)
{
    struct cdev *p = container_of(kobj, struct cdev, kobj);
    cdev_purge(p);
}

static void cdev_dynamic_release(struct kobject *kobj)
{
    struct cdev *p = container_of(kobj, struct cdev, kobj);
    cdev_purge(p);
    kfree(p);    /* cdev is freed here! */
}

static struct kobj_type ktype_cdev_default = {
    .release        = cdev_default_release,
};

static struct kobj_type ktype_cdev_dynamic = {
    .release        = cdev_dynamic_release,
};

A Case to Solve Memroy Leak bug

近期Imgsrc一处内存泄露问题的查找和解决

This is a very interesting case to resolve a memory leak issue in ImageMagick library.

How "mtdparts=" Kernel Command Line Work in Nexus One

I am just wondering how it works.
And...source code is your answers.

I clone kernel source from cm-kernel
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/cm-kernel.git
branch: android-msm-2.6.37

1. arch/arm/mach-msm/nand_partitions.c:
   Extract partition information from ATAG setup by boot loader.
   
   static int __init parse_tag_msm_partition(...)
   {
       ....
       msm_nand_data.nr_parts = count;
       msm_nand_data.parts = msm_nand_partitions;
   
       return 0;
   }
   
   This puts partition information into flash_platform_data
   
   
2. drivers/mtd/devices/msm_nand.c  (msm nand flash controller driver)
   
   // request to use cmdlinepart parser
   static const char *part_probes[] = { "cmdlinepart", NULL,  };
   ...
   static int __devinit msm_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   {
       ...
   #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
       err = parse_mtd_partitions(&info->mtd, part_probes,    
                                  &info->parts, 0);
       // if kernel command line has partition information, use it!
       if (err > 0)
           add_mtd_partitions(&info->mtd, info->parts, err);
       else if (err <= 0 && pdata && pdata->parts) {
           // else use partition information from boot loader
           for (i = 0; i < pdata->nr_parts; ++i) {
               pdata->parts[i].offset *= info->mtd.erasesize;
               pdata->parts[i].size *= info->mtd.erasesize;
           }
           add_mtd_partitions(&info->mtd,
                              pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
       } else
   #endif
           err = add_mtd_device(&info->mtd);
   }